Are there only two primitive emotions? A reply to frijda
نویسندگان
چکیده
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
منابع مشابه
Circularity in Searle’s Social Ontology: With a Hegelian Reply
John Searle’s theory of social ontology posits that there are indispensable normative components in the linguistic apparatuses termed status functions, collective intentionality, and collective recognition, all of which, he argues, make the social world. In this paper, I argue that these building blocks of Searle’s social ontology are caught in a petitio of constitutive circularity. Mo...
متن کاملThe discrete emotion response format is reflected in the emotion terms on the circumference of the GEW. As with other discrete emotion
Emotions can be defined as multi-componential, including subjective feeling, appraisals, reactions in the service of action preparation and expressions, action tendencies (including expressions), and regulation (compare Scherer, 2005; Frijda, 2007). A central component of emotions, the “feeling component,” is inherently subjective and can only be assessed with selfreport measures, such as the G...
متن کاملMultiple Agents With Emotional Behaviour in The Blocks World
Ag eneral architecture for the computer implementation of a theory of emotions is presented. The model is based mainly on a cognitive orientated theory proposed by Frijda 1986 where emotions are described as the manifestations of a concern satisfaction system. The model applies the theory to multiple agents in a blocks world environment where actions may or may not be emotional. Related work is...
متن کاملRadically Questioning the Principle of the Least Restrictive Alternative: A Reply to Nir Eyal; Comment on “Nudging by Shaming, Shaming by Nudging”
In his insightful editorial, Nir Eyal explores the connections between nudging and shaming. One upshot of his argument is that we should question the principle of the least restrictive alternative in public health and health policy. In this commentary, I maintain that Eyal’s argument undermines only a rather implausible version of the principle of the least restrictive alternative and I sketch ...
متن کامل